Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it. To fix grammar and spelling mistakes to clarify the meaning of the post (without. We already don't give rep.
Soaps She Knows The Young And The Restless Recaps at Edwin Hare blog
I already flagged this behavior and the flag got rejected. Is such editing now encouraged, or is this a user just trying to get credit for lots of edits? My guess is that it is just a farming tactic to get a little bit of reputation for not much effort and/or because they don't have sufficient knowledge to gain reputation from answers and questions.
Prior to 2017, the top bar used to show a count of pending suggested edits to 2k+ users.
Yes, edits that significantly improve a post are always welcome! This question and every answer to it have just been edited with mostly trivial edits. I imagine this would cause argument about what constitutes a very minor edit. 14 today i've noticed several suggested edits (such as this one) which have all the hallmarks of the editor taking the question and prompting a generative ai tool to expand on it.
I found a user who's been editing posts a lot. Then, the top bar was completely redesigned to remove any numbers related to reviewing, and. Common reasons for edits include: Have a different limit for small edits and bigger edits:
Thanks to search engines, questions and answers become authoritative for the whole.
The edits fall into various categories, such as retagging, fixing That improvement can come either by way of fixing formatting, correcting spelling/grammar mistakes, clarifying a title, and.
