Then, the top bar was completely redesigned to remove any numbers related to reviewing, and. 14 today i've noticed several suggested edits (such as this one) which have all the hallmarks of the editor taking the question and prompting a generative ai tool to expand on it. That improvement can come either by way of fixing formatting, correcting spelling/grammar mistakes, clarifying a title, and.
Harley West Age, Height, Net Worth, Boyfriend, Bio, Facts, Wiki
I found a user who's been editing posts a lot. We already don't give rep. The edits fall into various categories, such as retagging, fixing
Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it.
Prior to 2017, the top bar used to show a count of pending suggested edits to 2k+ users. Have a different limit for small edits and bigger edits: Yes, edits that significantly improve a post are always welcome! I imagine this would cause argument about what constitutes a very minor edit.
I already flagged this behavior and the flag got rejected. Thanks to search engines, questions and answers become authoritative for the whole. Is such editing now encouraged, or is this a user just trying to get credit for lots of edits? To fix grammar and spelling mistakes to clarify the meaning of the post (without.
My guess is that it is just a farming tactic to get a little bit of reputation for not much effort and/or because they don't have sufficient knowledge to gain reputation from answers and questions.
Common reasons for edits include: This question and every answer to it have just been edited with mostly trivial edits.
